Bindeshwar Roy vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/5509/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 01-Apr-2024

CNR: BRHC010293162024

e-Filing Number

13-03-2024

Filing Number

CWJC/6560/2024

Filing Date

14-Mar-2024

Registration No

CWJC/5509/2024

Registration Date

30-Mar-2024

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

LAND ACQUISITION ( 5900 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bindeshwar Roy

    Adv. Rajeev Ranjan,Bela Singh,Bela Singh, ,Bela Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

    Adv. ,Maurya Vijay Chandra,Saket Tiwary,saket tiwary,Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey 1123

  2. 2.The Commissioner-cum-Arbitrator,

  3. 3.The D.M.-cum-Collector,

  4. 4.The District Land Acquisition Officer,

  5. 5.National Highway Authority Of India,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: CWJC/5509/2024 Bindeshwar Roy challenged the arbitrator's order rejecting his compensation claim for land acquired for NH-527C project, arguing the land should be classified as commercial rather than residential. After hearing arguments, the court granted the petitioner liberty to pursue his grievance in civil court and disposed of the writ petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2024

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

  4. 14-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/5509/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWJC/5509/2024 Bindeshwar Roy challenged the arbitrator's order rejecting his compensation claim for land acquired for NH-527C project, arguing the land should be classified as commercial rather than residential. After hearing arguments, the court granted the petitioner liberty to pursue his grievance in civil court and disposed of the writ petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case