Shalini Kumari vs The State of Bihar through Director general of Police Jawaharlal Neharu Marag — MJC/844/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010290992026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
MJC/6266/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
MJC/844/2026
Registration Date
25-Mar-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha
Coram
Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
RESTORATION-SJ ( 200 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shalini Kumari
Adv. Chandra Kant
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar through Director general of Police Jawaharlal Neharu Marag
-
2.The Director General of Police Jawaharlal Neharu Marag,
-
3.The DIG
-
4.The District Magistrate
-
5.The Superintendent of Police
-
6.The SHO (Station House Officer)
-
7.Abdul Kadir
-
8.Abdul Najir,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Mr. Justice Arun Kumar JhaView PDF
The Patna High Court allowed petitioner Shalini Kumari's application to restore Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 797 of 2022, which had been dismissed for non-prosecution on 13.02.2026. Justice Arun Kumar Jha found the petitioner's explanations for the omission satisfactory and restored the case to its original file for continued proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Orders (On Office Notes) - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha
-
01-May-2026
For Orders (On Office Notes) - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha
-
10-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/844/2026
The Patna High Court allowed petitioner Shalini Kumari's application to restore Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 797 of 2022, which had been dismissed for non-prosecution on 13.02.2026. Justice Arun Kumar Jha found the petitioner's explanations for the omission satisfactory and restored the case to its original file for continued proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts