Raj Kumar Singh vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/5402/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010281942024
e-Filing Number
11-03-2024
Filing Number
CWJC/6317/2024
Filing Date
12-Mar-2024
Registration No
CWJC/5402/2024
Registration Date
28-Mar-2024
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 6700 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raj Kumar Singh
Adv. Ajit Kumar,Abhay Kumar,Abhay Kumar, Shailendra Kumar,Abhay Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
Adv. Naresh Dikshit (Spl. P.P. Mines) 1123
-
2.The Principal Secretary,
-
3.The District Magistrate-cum-Collector,
-
4.The S.D.O., Sadar,
-
5.The Managing Officer,
-
6.The District Mining Officer,
-
7.The Circle Officer, Agiwan,
-
8.M/s Maha Laxmi Enterprises,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
The Patna High Court disposed of Raj Kumar Singh's writ petition challenging mining and excavation activities on his raiyati land in Bhojpur district, directing him to approach the District Collector within four weeks with supporting documents. The court found that as per the Mines Department's counter affidavit, the Collector must be approached before invoking writ jurisdiction, and allowed the petitioner to pursue the matter administratively before the Collector, who shall hear both parties and resolve the dispute expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Mar-2024
For Admission - Fresh Cases
-
12-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/5402/2024
The Patna High Court disposed of Raj Kumar Singh's writ petition challenging mining and excavation activities on his raiyati land in Bhojpur district, directing him to approach the District Collector within four weeks with supporting documents. The court found that as per the Mines Department's counter affidavit, the Collector must be approached before invoking writ jurisdiction, and allowed the petitioner to pursue the matter administratively before the Collector, who shall hear both parties and resolve the dispute expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts