Shree Bhagwan Singh vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/5835/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Apr-2026

CNR: BRHC010276492026

e-Filing Number

14-03-2026

Filing Number

CWJC/5981/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWJC/5835/2026

Registration Date

16-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 6700 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shree Bhagwan Singh

    Adv. Mukesh Kumar No1

  2. 2.Ranjeet Kumar Singh,

  3. 3.Ram Kishun Singh,

  4. 4.Ram Manohar Singh,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The Distt. Magistrate,

  3. 3.The Circle Officer,

  4. 4.Ram Kumar Ram,

  5. 5.Ram Prit Ram,

  6. 6.Ram Nath Ram,

  7. 7.Rameshwar Ram,

  8. 8.Bangali Ram,

  9. 9.Vidhya Ram,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    The Patna High Court disposed of the writ petition after the petitioners' counsel agreed to file a fresh petition before the District Magistrate of Samastipur to challenge a Purcha (land order) dated 20.02.2024 affecting their property. The court allowed the petitioners to approach the District Magistrate, who undertook to hear and decide the petition on merit within four weeks, disposing of the writ petition without ruling on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/5835/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Patna High Court disposed of the writ petition after the petitioners' counsel agreed to file a fresh petition before the District Magistrate of Samastipur to challenge a Purcha (land order) dated 20.02.2024 affecting their property. The court allowed the petitioners to approach the District Magistrate, who undertook to hear and decide the petition on merit within four weeks, disposing of the writ petition without ruling on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case