Sanjha Devi vs The State of Bihar — L.P.A /222/2026
Case under Patna High Court Rules Section Clause 10. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th March 2026.
CNR: BRHC010274082026
e-Filing Number
14-03-2026
Filing Number
L.P.A /5942/2026
Filing Date
16-03-2026
Registration No
L.P.A /222/2026
Registration Date
17-03-2026
Judge
The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Harish Kumar
Coram
The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Harish Kumar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
LPA ( 3 )
Sub-Category
LPA ( 15022 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanjha Devi
Adv. Awnish Kumar
Respondent(s)
The State of Bihar
Adv. ,Ranjeet Kumar Pandey 1123
The Commissioner -cum- Dy. Director, Panchayati Raj,
The District Magistrate,
The Deputy Development Commissioner -Cum- Chief Executive Officer,
Aditi Kumari,
Adv. Jai Vardhan Narayan
Hearing History
Judge: The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Harish Kumar
FOR ORDERS (ON OFFICE NOTES)
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CASES
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CASES
FOR ORDERS (ON OFFICE NOTES)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | FOR ORDERS (ON OFFICE NOTES) | |
| 25-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CASES | |
| 24-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CASES | |
| 23-03-2026 | FOR ORDERS (ON OFFICE NOTES) |
Orders
The Patna High Court dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal filed by Sanjha Devi (Vice-Chairman, Zila Parishad) against the Single Judge's order, as the underlying civil writ case remains sub judice (pending before the court). The court found it inappropriate to entertain the appeal while the matter is still under consideration and directed the case to be listed among the top ten cases for expedited hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Patna High Court dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal filed by Sanjha Devi (Vice-Chairman, Zila Parishad) against the Single Judge's order, as the underlying civil writ case remains sub judice (pending before the court). The court found it inappropriate to entertain the appeal while the matter is still under consideration and directed the case to be listed among the top ten cases for expedited hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts