Motilal Mehta vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/6169/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Apr-2026

CNR: BRHC010272292026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

CWJC/5918/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWJC/6169/2026

Registration Date

21-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

Coram

Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 6700 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Motilal Mehta

    Adv. Prafull Chandra Thakur,Madhumala Kumari,Madhumala Kumari, ,Madhumala Kumari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The Principal Secretary,

  3. 3.The District Magistrate,

  4. 4.The Deputy Collector cum first appellate Authority Public Grievance Redressal,

  5. 5.The Deputy Collector,

  6. 6.The Circle Officer,

  7. 7.Bindeshwari Yadav,

  8. 8.Manoj Yadav,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Khatim RezaView PDF

    Case Summary: CWJC/6169/2026 Court Decision: The Patna High Court directed the Circle Officer, Kumarkhand, Madhepura to measure the petitioner's Rayati land (Khata Nos. 28 and 278) and pass a reasoned order within six weeks. The court found that despite the petitioner filing a measurement application on 21.12.2024 with fees deposited and a follow-up representation on 07.01.2025, the Circle Officer had taken no action, constituting administrative inaction warranting mandamus intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/6169/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWJC/6169/2026 Court Decision: The Patna High Court directed the Circle Officer, Kumarkhand, Madhepura to measure the petitioner's Rayati land (Khata Nos. 28 and 278) and pass a reasoned order within six weeks. The court found that despite the petitioner filing a measurement application on 21.12.2024 with fees deposited and a follow-up representation on 07.01.2025, the Circle Officer had taken no action, constituting administrative inaction warranting mandamus intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case