Smt. Niru Kumari alias Niru Devi vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/6010/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Apr-2026

CNR: BRHC010252722026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

CWJC/5518/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWJC/6010/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 6700 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Niru Kumari alias Niru Devi

    Adv. Ajay Kumar

  2. 2.Smt. Shobha Kumari,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The Commissioner, Patna Division,

  3. 3.The Collector, Patna,

  4. 4.The Additional Collector, Patna Sadar,

  5. 5.The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Paliganj,

  6. 6.The Circle Officer, Bikram,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: CWJC/6010/2026 The Patna High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Smt. Niru Kumari and Smt. Shobha Kumari challenging the Deputy Collector's order rejecting their application to declare their Bakast land as raiyati land. Justice Rajiv Roy held that when a petition challenges a revenue authority's order before a superior authority, it must be considered with proper notice and hearing of parties, and a reasoned order is mandatory. The petition was disposed with this observation, directing the respondent authorities to reconsider the matter accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/6010/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWJC/6010/2026 The Patna High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Smt. Niru Kumari and Smt. Shobha Kumari challenging the Deputy Collector's order rejecting their application to declare their Bakast land as raiyati land. Justice Rajiv Roy held that when a petition challenges a revenue authority's order before a superior authority, it must be considered with proper notice and hearing of parties, and a reasoned order is mandatory. The petition was disposed with this observation, directing the respondent authorities to reconsider the matter accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case