Bauan Chaupal vs The State of Bihar — MJC/473/2022
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010226282022
e-Filing Number
24-03-2022
Filing Number
MJC/5421/2022
Filing Date
24-Mar-2022
Registration No
MJC/473/2022
Registration Date
25-Mar-2022
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bauan Chaupal
Adv. Rajesh Mohan
-
2.Manoj Mishra
-
3.Md. Asharaf Ali,
-
4.Hari Mohan Mishra
-
5.Nabnit Kumar Chaudhary
-
6.Razi Ahmad Khan
-
7.Arun Kumar Yadav
-
8.Kumar Manish
-
9.Sanjay Kumar Jha
-
10.Sikandra Sahani,
-
11.Ratan Jha,
-
12.Sunil Kumar Mishra,
-
13.KumKum Jha,
-
14.Radha Kumari
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.Mr. R.K. Mahajan,
-
3.Mr. Arvind Kumar Verma,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
The Patna High Court dismissed a contempt petition filed by 14 petitioners against the State of Bihar and education officials for alleged disobedience of a February 2018 court order. The court found that the State's show cause response and an August 2022 order rejected the petitioners' claim, and disposed of the contempt petition while granting liberty to the petitioners to pursue any remaining grievances through appropriate channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-May-2022
Miscellaneous
The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima
-
24-Mar-2022
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/473/2022
The Patna High Court dismissed a contempt petition filed by 14 petitioners against the State of Bihar and education officials for alleged disobedience of a February 2018 court order. The court found that the State's show cause response and an August 2022 order rejected the petitioners' claim, and disposed of the contempt petition while granting liberty to the petitioners to pursue any remaining grievances through appropriate channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts