Nagina Ram vs The State of Bihar — MJC/972/2021
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010224932021
e-Filing Number
12-03-2021
Filing Number
MJC/5489/2021
Filing Date
12-Mar-2021
Registration No
MJC/972/2021
Registration Date
17-Mar-2021
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nagina Ram
Adv. Navin Kumar Sinha,Vikalp,Vikalp, ,Vikalp
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.Sri Pankaj Kumar, The Commissioner,
-
3.Sri Dr. Chandeshwar Singh, The District Magistrate,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: MJC/972/2021 Nagina Ram filed a contempt petition against the State of Bihar and its officials for alleged willful disobedience of a January 9, 2020 court order. The District Magistrate's show cause response indicated that a list including the petitioner's name had been prepared and sent to the General Administration Department, suggesting compliance with the original order. The High Court of Patna disposed of the contempt petition, granting the petitioner liberty to pursue further relief if any grievance remained unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Dec-2021
Miscellaneous
The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima
-
12-Mar-2021
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/972/2021
Case Summary: MJC/972/2021 Nagina Ram filed a contempt petition against the State of Bihar and its officials for alleged willful disobedience of a January 9, 2020 court order. The District Magistrate's show cause response indicated that a list including the petitioner's name had been prepared and sent to the General Administration Department, suggesting compliance with the original order. The High Court of Patna disposed of the contempt petition, granting the petitioner liberty to pursue further relief if any grievance remained unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts