Umashankar Yadav vs The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms — MJC/874/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th June 2026.
CNR: BRHC010219502025
e-Filing Number
27-02-2025
Filing Number
MJC/5364/2025
Filing Date
28-Feb-2025
Registration No
MJC/874/2025
Registration Date
03-Mar-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
Coram
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Umashankar Yadav
Adv. Shashank Chandra,Kumari Shubham,Kumari Shubham, ,Kumari Shubham
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms
Adv. ,Sunil Kumar Mandal 1123
-
2.Sri Dinesh Kumar Rai, the District Magistrate,
-
3.Dr. Shaurya Suman, the Superintendent of Police,
-
4.Sri Surya Prakash Gupta, the Sub Divisional Officer,
-
5.Sri Jay Prakash Singh, the Sub Divisional Police Officer,
-
6.Sri Ashish Anand, the Circle Officer,
-
7.Sri Deepak Kumar, the Officer-In-Charge,
-
8.Islam Gadi,
-
9.Nafis Ahmad,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar ShahView PDF
Case Summary: In MJC/874/2025 (a contempt petition), the Patna High Court dismissed the case on June 19, 2026, after petitioner Umashankar Yadav's counsel sought withdrawal with no objection from the State. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah granted the dismissal as "not pressed." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
For Admission - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
-
28-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/874/2025
Case Summary: In MJC/874/2025 (a contempt petition), the Patna High Court dismissed the case on June 19, 2026, after petitioner Umashankar Yadav's counsel sought withdrawal with no objection from the State. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah granted the dismissal as "not pressed." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts