Sharda Devi, vs The Union of India — MJC/781/2020
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 11,12. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010218472020
Filing Number
MJC/5717/2020
Filing Date
25-Feb-2020
Registration No
MJC/781/2020
Registration Date
25-Feb-2020
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sharda Devi,
Adv. Harendra Pratap Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Union of India
Adv. ,Santosh Kumar,Kumari Priya Ranjan (CGC),Kumar Priya Ranjan (CGC),Satyendra Kumar Jha 1123
-
2.Mr. B. Prasad,
-
3.Mr. A.K. Singh,
-
4.Mr. S. Prasad,
-
5.Mr. S. Singh,
-
6.Mr. D.K. Singh,
-
7.Mr. K.K. Singh,
-
8.Mr. N.K. Singh,
-
9.Mr. K.P. Singh,
-
10.Mr. Kapil Prasad,
-
11.Mr. Narayan Ray,
-
12.Mr. P. Verma,
-
13.Mr. Kapildeo,
-
14.Mr. Sanjay Kumar,
-
15.Mr. B.P. Verma,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: MJC/781/2020 Sharda Devi filed a contempt petition against the Union of India and BSNL officials for willful disobedience of a September 1, 2015 order in an earlier civil writ case. The Patna High Court found that the Union and relevant officials had made payment to the petitioner as shown in their response. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the contempt petition while granting the petitioner liberty to file further grievances if any remain unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2022
Miscellaneous
The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima
-
25-Feb-2020
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/781/2020
Case Summary: MJC/781/2020 Sharda Devi filed a contempt petition against the Union of India and BSNL officials for willful disobedience of a September 1, 2015 order in an earlier civil writ case. The Patna High Court found that the Union and relevant officials had made payment to the petitioner as shown in their response. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the contempt petition while granting the petitioner liberty to file further grievances if any remain unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts