Sanjay Kumar Singh (Advocate) vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/5038/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Mar-2025

CNR: BRHC010202852025

e-Filing Number

21-02-2025

Filing Number

CWJC/4936/2025

Filing Date

22-Feb-2025

Registration No

CWJC/5038/2025

Registration Date

26-Mar-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad , Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad , Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

PIL- Others ( 310 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Kumar Singh (Advocate)

    Adv. Pranav Kumar Jha,Subodh Kumar Jha,Subodh Kumar Jha, ,Subodh Kumar Jha

  2. 2.Pramod Kumar Singh (Advocate),

  3. 3.Maheshwari Yadav (Advocate),

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

    Adv. ,ANUKRITI JAIPURIYAR 1123

  2. 2.The Honble Patna High Court

  3. 3.The Cabinet Secretary, Government of Bihar,

  4. 4.The Principal Secretary, Law Department,

  5. 5.The Joint Secretary, Department of Law and Justice,

  6. 6.The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Banka Civil Court,

  7. 7.The Registrar, Civil Court, Banka,

  8. 8.The District Magistrate,

  9. 9.The Executive Engineer,

  10. 10.The Chairman, Infrastructure Committee,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar ShahView PDF

    CWJC/5038/2025 Summary: The Patna High Court dismissed a PIL filed by three Banka advocates challenging the State's decision to construct a new court complex on land 2km away from the old campus, instead of expanding within the existing campus. The court found no genuine public interest element in the petition, noting the land was selected after proper consultation with stakeholders including the Principal District Judge, District Magistrate, and Infrastructure Committees. Entertaining the petition would only hinder ongoing construction progress. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jan-2026

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh , Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma

  4. 25-Jul-2025

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  5. 04-Jul-2025

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  6. 27-Jun-2025

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  7. 20-Jun-2025

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  8. 16-May-2025

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  9. 09-May-2025

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  10. 02-May-2025

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  11. 25-Apr-2025

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  12. 04-Apr-2025

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  13. 27-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 22-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/5038/2025

casestatus.in Summary

CWJC/5038/2025 Summary: The Patna High Court dismissed a PIL filed by three Banka advocates challenging the State's decision to construct a new court complex on land 2km away from the old campus, instead of expanding within the existing campus. The court found no genuine public interest element in the petition, noting the land was selected after proper consultation with stakeholders including the Principal District Judge, District Magistrate, and Infrastructure Committees. Entertaining the petition would only hinder ongoing construction progress. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case