Sanjay Kumar Singh (Advocate) vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/5038/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010202852025
e-Filing Number
21-02-2025
Filing Number
CWJC/4936/2025
Filing Date
22-Feb-2025
Registration No
CWJC/5038/2025
Registration Date
26-Mar-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad , Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad , Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
PIL- Others ( 310 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sanjay Kumar Singh (Advocate)
Adv. Pranav Kumar Jha,Subodh Kumar Jha,Subodh Kumar Jha, ,Subodh Kumar Jha
-
2.Pramod Kumar Singh (Advocate),
-
3.Maheshwari Yadav (Advocate),
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
Adv. ,ANUKRITI JAIPURIYAR 1123
-
2.The Honble Patna High Court
-
3.The Cabinet Secretary, Government of Bihar,
-
4.The Principal Secretary, Law Department,
-
5.The Joint Secretary, Department of Law and Justice,
-
6.The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Banka Civil Court,
-
7.The Registrar, Civil Court, Banka,
-
8.The District Magistrate,
-
9.The Executive Engineer,
-
10.The Chairman, Infrastructure Committee,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar ShahView PDF
CWJC/5038/2025 Summary: The Patna High Court dismissed a PIL filed by three Banka advocates challenging the State's decision to construct a new court complex on land 2km away from the old campus, instead of expanding within the existing campus. The court found no genuine public interest element in the petition, noting the land was selected after proper consultation with stakeholders including the Principal District Judge, District Magistrate, and Infrastructure Committees. Entertaining the petition would only hinder ongoing construction progress. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jan-2026
For Orders
Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh , Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma
-
25-Jul-2025
For Orders
Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
-
04-Jul-2025
For Orders
Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
-
27-Jun-2025
For Orders
Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
-
20-Jun-2025
For Orders
Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
-
16-May-2025
For Orders
Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
-
09-May-2025
For Orders
Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
-
02-May-2025
For Orders
Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
-
25-Apr-2025
For Orders
Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
-
04-Apr-2025
For Orders
Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
-
27-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/5038/2025
CWJC/5038/2025 Summary: The Patna High Court dismissed a PIL filed by three Banka advocates challenging the State's decision to construct a new court complex on land 2km away from the old campus, instead of expanding within the existing campus. The court found no genuine public interest element in the petition, noting the land was selected after proper consultation with stakeholders including the Principal District Judge, District Magistrate, and Infrastructure Committees. Entertaining the petition would only hinder ongoing construction progress. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts