The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd., vs Fekan Devi (Kumari), — MA/294/2021
Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 173. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010198242021
e-Filing Number
05-03-2021
Filing Number
MA/4951/2021
Filing Date
05-Mar-2021
Registration No
MA/294/2021
Registration Date
12-Mar-2021
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd.,
Adv. Abhoy Kumar Kashyap,Sanjay Kumar Sharan,Sanjay Kumar Sharan, ,Sanjay Kumar Sharan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Fekan Devi (Kumari),
-
2.Sanjiv Kumar,
-
3.Sushant Kumar Paswan,
-
4.Sanoj Kumar,
-
5.Sikha Kumari,
-
6.Premlata Devi,
-
7.Nand Kishore Mandal,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
-
07-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: MA/294/2021 National Insurance Company Ltd. filed a contempt petition before the Patna High Court seeking action against the respondents (the family of Late Shyam Sundar Paswan and others) for willful disobedience of an order dated 07.09.2020 passed in CWJC No.7165 of 2017. However, the insurance company's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition during hearing, and the court disposed of the matter as withdrawn. The court directed that any statutory amount deposited, if any, be returned to the appellant company. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Feb-2025
Miscellaneous
The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima
-
05-Mar-2021
Case filed
Registration No. MA/294/2021
Case Summary: MA/294/2021 National Insurance Company Ltd. filed a contempt petition before the Patna High Court seeking action against the respondents (the family of Late Shyam Sundar Paswan and others) for willful disobedience of an order dated 07.09.2020 passed in CWJC No.7165 of 2017. However, the insurance company's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition during hearing, and the court disposed of the matter as withdrawn. The court directed that any statutory amount deposited, if any, be returned to the appellant company. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts