Kripashankar Ram vs The State of Bihar — MJC/664/2020

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 10,12. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010186652020

Filing Number

MJC/4855/2020

Filing Date

18-Feb-2020

Registration No

MJC/664/2020

Registration Date

18-Feb-2020

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 10,12
Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kripashankar Ram

    Adv. Ramchandra Singh,Panchanand Prasad Kharwar,Panchanand Prasad Kharwar, Panchanand Prasad Kharwar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

    Adv. ,Satyam Shivam Sundaram 1123

  2. 2.The Special Director,

  3. 3.The Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board

  4. 4.Dr. Bharti Mehta,

  5. 5.Mr. Anil Kumar,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: Kripashankar Ram filed a contempt petition against the State of Bihar and the Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board for willfully disobeying a court order dated 29.07.2019 from the original civil writ case (CWJC No. 4255 of 2016). Justice Rajiv Roy found that the petitioner's grievance had been redressed and the matter had become infructuous, therefore disposing of the contempt petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Jul-2022

    Miscellaneous

    The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima

  4. 18-Feb-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/664/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Kripashankar Ram filed a contempt petition against the State of Bihar and the Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board for willfully disobeying a court order dated 29.07.2019 from the original civil writ case (CWJC No. 4255 of 2016). Justice Rajiv Roy found that the petitioner's grievance had been redressed and the matter had become infructuous, therefore disposing of the contempt petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case