Barun Kumar vs The State of Bihar — MJC/766/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010186632025
e-Filing Number
18-02-2025
Filing Number
MJC/4523/2025
Filing Date
19-Feb-2025
Registration No
MJC/766/2025
Registration Date
22-Feb-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Barun Kumar
Adv. Amit Anand,Lalan Kumar Singh,Lalan Kumar Singh, ,Amit Anand,Lalan Kumar Singh
-
2.Mohinddin Athar,
-
3.Raja Ram Mahto,
-
4.Shiv Shankar Paswan,
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.Mr. Dr. B. Rajendra, The Principal Secretary,
-
3.Mr. Bhagwat Ram, The Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Special Secretary,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: The Patna High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed by four petitioners against Bihar's state officials (Principal Secretary and Engineer-in-Chief of the Rural Work Department) for allegedly violating a July 23, 2024 court order in Civil Writ Case No. 10880 of 2024. The court found the contempt petition infructuous as the petitioner's counsel confirmed compliance with the original order, rendering the contempt proceedings moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Lokadalat ( For Orders )
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
-
06-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/766/2025
Case Summary: The Patna High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed by four petitioners against Bihar's state officials (Principal Secretary and Engineer-in-Chief of the Rural Work Department) for allegedly violating a July 23, 2024 court order in Civil Writ Case No. 10880 of 2024. The court found the contempt petition infructuous as the petitioner's counsel confirmed compliance with the original order, rendering the contempt proceedings moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts