Ashfaque Ansari vs That State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Saran at Chhapra Advocate - Nikesh Kumar — MJC/526/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--CONSIGNED on 08th May 2026.

CNR: BRHC010186582026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

MJC/3956/2026

Filing Date

17-02-2026

Registration No

MJC/526/2026

Registration Date

18-02-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONSIGNED

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Courts Act Section 10,11,12
Patna High Court Rules Section XXVIIA,3

Petitioner(s)

Ashfaque Ansari

Adv. Chandan Kumar,Md Fazle Karim,Md Fazle Karim, ,Md Fazle Karim

Respondent(s)

That State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Saran at Chhapra Advocate - Nikesh Kumar

The District Magistrate, Saran at Chhapra,

Th Deputy Development Commissioner, Saran at Chhapra,

Zila Parishad Chhapra,

Adv. Bajarangi Lal

The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad,

The District Engineer, Zila Parishad,

Hearing History

Judge: Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh

11-03-2026

FOR ORDERS (ON OFFICE NOTES) - TIED UP

08-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION - TIED UP

01-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION - TIED UP

17-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION - TIED UP

18-03-2026

FOR ORDERS (ON OFFICE NOTES) - TIED UP

Orders

08-05-2026
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh

Case Summary: MJC/526/2026 Court Decision: The Patna High Court found that the contempt order against Opposite Party No. 3 (Deputy Development Commissioner, Saran) has been complied with based on statements and information in the supplementary show cause documents. The contempt petition is accordingly consigned (closed). The petitioner is permitted to seek further remedy before appropriate authorities if aggrieved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MJC/526/2026 Court Decision: The Patna High Court found that the contempt order against Opposite Party No. 3 (Deputy Development Commissioner, Saran) has been complied with based on statements and information in the supplementary show cause documents. The contempt petition is accordingly consigned (closed). The petitioner is permitted to seek further remedy before appropriate authorities if aggrieved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case