Kumari Mamta vs The State of Bihar — MJC/631/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010179892024
Filing Number
MJC/4061/2024
Filing Date
16-Feb-2024
Registration No
MJC/631/2024
Registration Date
19-Feb-2024
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kumari Mamta
Adv. Ratanakar Jha
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.Mr. Shailendra Kumar, the District Panchayat Raj Officer,
-
3.Mr. Shri Rajesh Kumar, The District Education Officer,
-
4.Md. Upendra Thakur, the Establishment Deputy Collector,
-
5.Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, The Block Development Officer Laukahi
-
6.Mr. Abhijeet Choudhary, The Block Development Officer
-
7.Mr. Vishnudev The Block Education Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: MJC/631/2024 Kumari Mamta filed a contempt petition against Bihar state officials for willfully disobeying a court order dated 31.01.2022 in the underlying civil case. The Patna High Court found that the petitioner had been paid Rs. 13,43,690.48 via RTGS on 08.04.2024, thereby disposing of the contempt petition while granting the petitioner liberty to pursue further grievances if any remain. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Mar-2024
Miscellaneous
The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima
-
16-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/631/2024
Case Summary: MJC/631/2024 Kumari Mamta filed a contempt petition against Bihar state officials for willfully disobeying a court order dated 31.01.2022 in the underlying civil case. The Patna High Court found that the petitioner had been paid Rs. 13,43,690.48 via RTGS on 08.04.2024, thereby disposing of the contempt petition while granting the petitioner liberty to pursue further grievances if any remain. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts