UPENDRA NARAYAN MEHTA and ANR vs The State of Bihar and anr — MJC/684/2019

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010177532019

Filing Number

MJC/8503/2019

Filing Date

13-Feb-2019

Registration No

MJC/684/2019

Registration Date

13-Feb-2019

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Courts Act Section 10,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UPENDRA NARAYAN MEHTA and ANR

    Adv. Syed Masleh uddin Ashraf

  2. 2.Rajendra Narayan Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar and anr

  2. 2.Mr. Arvind Kumar Verma,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    The Patna High Court disposed of the contempt petition filed by Upendra Narayan Mehta and Rajendra Narayan Singh against the State of Bihar and the Director of Primary Education. The petitioners had sought initiation of contempt proceedings for alleged willful disobedience of a prior court order dated 01.08.2018, but the court found that the order had been complied with and accordingly dismissed the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay

  4. 13-Mar-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Feb-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/684/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The Patna High Court disposed of the contempt petition filed by Upendra Narayan Mehta and Rajendra Narayan Singh against the State of Bihar and the Director of Primary Education. The petitioners had sought initiation of contempt proceedings for alleged willful disobedience of a prior court order dated 01.08.2018, but the court found that the order had been complied with and accordingly dismissed the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case