Anil Kumar Ram vs The State of Bihar — MJC/598/2020

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010167952020

Filing Number

MJC/4350/2020

Filing Date

13-Feb-2020

Registration No

MJC/598/2020

Registration Date

13-Feb-2020

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Courts Act Section 11,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anil Kumar Ram

    Adv. Nawnit Kumar Tiwary

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

    Adv. ,Gyan Shankar,Lalit Kishore,Gyan Shankar 1123

  2. 2.Sri Pramod Kumar,

  3. 3.Sri Raghvendra Singh,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Summary of MJC/598/2020 In this contempt of court petition, Anil Kumar Ram sought initiation of contempt proceedings against Bihar government officials for alleged willful disobedience of an October 14, 2019 court order. The Bihar School Examination Board rejected the petitioner's claim via memo dated April 27, 2020. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the contempt petition by granting the petitioner liberty to agitate the matter further if his grievance remained unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Lokadalat ( For Orders )

    Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

  4. 13-Feb-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/598/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of MJC/598/2020 In this contempt of court petition, Anil Kumar Ram sought initiation of contempt proceedings against Bihar government officials for alleged willful disobedience of an October 14, 2019 court order. The Bihar School Examination Board rejected the petitioner's claim via memo dated April 27, 2020. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the contempt petition by granting the petitioner liberty to agitate the matter further if his grievance remained unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case