Rekha Kumari vs The State of Bihar — MJC/455/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010163462026

e-Filing Number

11-02-2026

Filing Number

MJC/3422/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

MJC/455/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

Coram

Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

RESTORATION-SJ ( 200 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rekha Kumari

    Adv. Siyaram Pandey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The Additional Chief Secretary, Water Resources Department,

  3. 3.The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department,

  4. 4.The Engineer in Chief cum Special Secretary,

  5. 5.The Superintending Engineer, Tirhut Canal Circle,

  6. 6.The Executive Engineer, Tirhut Canal Division Saraiya,

  7. 7.The Executive Engineer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar SinhaView PDF

    The Patna High Court allowed Rekha Kumari's application to restore Civil Writ Case No. 15423 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non-compliance with a previous peremptory order. The court accepted that certain document defects (Annexures P/1, P/3, P/4) could not be corrected timely because they were in the Water Resources Department's custody and the department failed to furnish them. The case was restored subject to compliance with the peremptory order within one week after summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Miscellaneous

    The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/455/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Patna High Court allowed Rekha Kumari's application to restore Civil Writ Case No. 15423 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non-compliance with a previous peremptory order. The court accepted that certain document defects (Annexures P/1, P/3, P/4) could not be corrected timely because they were in the Water Resources Department's custody and the department failed to furnish them. The case was restored subject to compliance with the peremptory order within one week after summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case