Lalan Kumar Jha vs The State of Bihar — MJC/831/2021
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010156012021
e-Filing Number
22-02-2021
Filing Number
MJC/4041/2021
Filing Date
22-Feb-2021
Registration No
MJC/831/2021
Registration Date
04-Mar-2021
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lalan Kumar Jha
Adv. Sukriti Kumari,Arvnendra Kumar Thakur,Arvnendra Kumar Thakur, ,Abhay Kumar Thakur,Arvnendra Kumar Thakur
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
Adv. SC 19,Rishi Raj Sinha,Rishi Raj Sinha 1123
-
2.Sri Vivek Kumar Singh
-
3.Sri Vivek Kumar Singh
-
4.Sri Nawal Kishore
-
5.Sri Surendra Kumar
-
6.Sri Lokesh Kumar Singh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: MJC/831/2021 Lalan Kumar Jha filed a contempt petition against Bihar government officials for allegedly violating a February 17, 2020 court order in a related civil writ case. The State counsel presented evidence (memo no.402 dated April 8, 2022) showing the Joint Director of Consolidation had rejected the petitioner's claim. The court disposed of the contempt petition while granting the petitioner liberty to pursue any remaining grievances through appropriate channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2022
Miscellaneous
The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima
-
22-Feb-2021
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/831/2021
Case Summary: MJC/831/2021 Lalan Kumar Jha filed a contempt petition against Bihar government officials for allegedly violating a February 17, 2020 court order in a related civil writ case. The State counsel presented evidence (memo no.402 dated April 8, 2022) showing the Joint Director of Consolidation had rejected the petitioner's claim. The court disposed of the contempt petition while granting the petitioner liberty to pursue any remaining grievances through appropriate channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts