Shyam Bihari Prasad vs The State Of Bihar and ors — MJC/4881/2018

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010154802018

Filing Number

MJC/121843/2018

Filing Date

05-Dec-2018

Registration No

MJC/4881/2018

Registration Date

05-Dec-2018

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shyam Bihari Prasad

    Adv. Ajay Kumar,Vishwa Nath Ram,Vishwa Nath Ram, ,Vishwa Nath Ram

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Bihar and ors

    Adv. ,Lala Purushottam Kr Rajgrihar,S. M. Ehtesham 1123

  2. 2.Sri Kameshwar Choudhary,

  3. 3.Sri Rameshwar Paswan

  4. 4.Sri Om prakash,

  5. 5.Sri Ashok Kumar

  6. 6.Sri Devendra Singh

  7. 7.Sri Mahanth Swaroop,

  8. 8.Smt. Mani K.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Shyam Bihari Prasad filed a contempt petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against Water Resources Department officials for alleged willful disobedience of an order dated 30.01.2016 from the original civil writ case. Justice Rajiv Roy found that memo no.6108 dated 16.08.2016 demonstrated the petitioner's claim had been disposed of, and dismissed the contempt petition while granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate any remaining grievances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Feb-2019

    Miscellaneous

    The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima

  4. 05-Dec-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/4881/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Shyam Bihari Prasad filed a contempt petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against Water Resources Department officials for alleged willful disobedience of an order dated 30.01.2016 from the original civil writ case. Justice Rajiv Roy found that memo no.6108 dated 16.08.2016 demonstrated the petitioner's claim had been disposed of, and dismissed the contempt petition while granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate any remaining grievances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case