Anita Devi vs The State of Bihar — MJC/446/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010115372025

e-Filing Number

31-01-2025

Filing Number

MJC/2754/2025

Filing Date

01-Feb-2025

Registration No

MJC/446/2025

Registration Date

05-Feb-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Courts Act Section 10,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anita Devi

    Adv. Sri Krishna Ranjan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.Mr. Divesh Sehara, Principal Secretary,

  3. 3.Srikant Shashtree District Magistrate,

  4. 4.Mr. Janardan Prasad Agrawal, District Panchayat Raj Officer,

  5. 5.Mr. Devanand Kumar Singh, Block Development Officer, Navinagar,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: MJC/446/2025 Anita Devi filed a contempt petition against Bihar state officials for allegedly violating a court order dated 08.10.2024 in Civil Writ Case No. 15609 of 2024. Justice Rajiv Roy heard both parties and disposed of the contempt petition by granting the petitioner liberty to agitate the matter if any grievance remained unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Lokadalat ( For Orders )

    Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

  4. 01-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/446/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MJC/446/2025 Anita Devi filed a contempt petition against Bihar state officials for allegedly violating a court order dated 08.10.2024 in Civil Writ Case No. 15609 of 2024. Justice Rajiv Roy heard both parties and disposed of the contempt petition by granting the petitioner liberty to agitate the matter if any grievance remained unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case