Satish Chandra vs The State Of Bihar, Through The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna and Ors — MJC/3277/2017

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Jun-2018

CNR: BRHC010112742017

Filing Number

MJC/89979/2017

Filing Date

13-Nov-2017

Registration No

MJC/3277/2017

Registration Date

13-Nov-2017

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Satish Chandra

    Adv. Sanjay Kumar Mishra,Manish Kumar Mishra,Manish Kumar Mishra, ,Ashok Kumar,Manish Kumar Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Bihar, Through The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna and Ors

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    The Patna High Court dismissed Satish Chandra's contempt petition seeking action against the State of Bihar for allegedly violating a January 23, 2017 order regarding rifle license grant. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the petition while granting the petitioner liberty to pursue the matter further if grievances remained, noting that the District Magistrate had rejected the petitioner's rifle license claim vide memo dated September 17, 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2022

    Lokadalat ( For Orders )

    Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma

  4. 10-Feb-2020

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha

  5. 03-Feb-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Nov-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/3277/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The Patna High Court dismissed Satish Chandra's contempt petition seeking action against the State of Bihar for allegedly violating a January 23, 2017 order regarding rifle license grant. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the petition while granting the petitioner liberty to pursue the matter further if grievances remained, noting that the District Magistrate had rejected the petitioner's rifle license claim vide memo dated September 17, 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case