Baban Prasad vs The State of Bihar — MJC/394/2020
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010112402020
Filing Number
MJC/2951/2020
Filing Date
31-Jan-2020
Registration No
MJC/394/2020
Registration Date
31-Jan-2020
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Baban Prasad
Adv. Prashant Kumar,Amit Kumar Singh,Amit Kumar Singh, Amit Kumar Singh
-
2.Vinod Kumar Prasad,
-
3.Radha Prasad Sah
-
4.Satish Kumar,
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.Sri S. Sidharth,
-
3.Sri Amir Subhani,
-
4.The Principal Secretary,
-
5.Sri Sunil Barnwal,
-
6.Sri Raghvendra Singh,
-
7.Smt. Neelan Chaudhary,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
The Patna High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed by petitioners alleging willful disobedience of an order dated 24.07.2018 from Civil Writ Case No. 1580 of 2014 against Bihar state officials. The court found that the District Magistrate, Buxar had already granted relief to the petitioners vide order dated 03.06.2021, and accordingly dismissed the contempt petition while granting liberty to the petitioners to file further applications if any grievance remained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jul-2022
Miscellaneous
The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima
-
31-Jan-2020
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/394/2020
The Patna High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed by petitioners alleging willful disobedience of an order dated 24.07.2018 from Civil Writ Case No. 1580 of 2014 against Bihar state officials. The court found that the District Magistrate, Buxar had already granted relief to the petitioners vide order dated 03.06.2021, and accordingly dismissed the contempt petition while granting liberty to the petitioners to file further applications if any grievance remained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts