Usha Kumari vs The State of Bihar — MJC/630/2021

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 10,12. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010079092021

Filing Number

MJC/1880/2021

Filing Date

29-Jan-2021

Registration No

MJC/630/2021

Registration Date

12-Feb-2021

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 10,12
Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Usha Kumari

    Adv. Ram Sagar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.Mr. Giriwar Dayal Singh the Director,

  3. 3.Mr. Surendra Kumar Sinha the Regional Deputy Director of Education,

  4. 4.Mr. Jyoti Kumar, The District Education Officer,

  5. 5.Smt. Kiran, the Acting Headmistress,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: MJC/630/2021 Usha Kumari filed a contempt petition against Bihar education officials for allegedly disobeying a February 13, 2020 court order in her earlier case (CWJC 8128/2015). The court found that a memorandum dated March 1, 2021 showed the petitioner's representation had been disposed of by the Regional Deputy Director, and therefore dismissed the contempt petition while granting the petitioner liberty to pursue further grievances if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Mar-2022

    Miscellaneous

    The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima

  4. 28-Mar-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 29-Jan-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/630/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MJC/630/2021 Usha Kumari filed a contempt petition against Bihar education officials for allegedly disobeying a February 13, 2020 court order in her earlier case (CWJC 8128/2015). The court found that a memorandum dated March 1, 2021 showed the petitioner's representation had been disposed of by the Regional Deputy Director, and therefore dismissed the contempt petition while granting the petitioner liberty to pursue further grievances if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case