Ram Pukar Singh vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/1840/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section Power of High Courts to issue certain writs-226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-Feb-2025

CNR: BRHC010078412025

e-Filing Number

22-01-2025

Filing Number

CWJC/1811/2025

Filing Date

23-Jan-2025

Registration No

CWJC/1840/2025

Registration Date

31-Jan-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh , Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh , Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

WORKS CONTRACT - TENDER AND BLACK LISTING ( 15053 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section Power of High Courts to issue certain writs-226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ram Pukar Singh

    Adv. Prashant Kashyap,Pawan Kumar Singh,Pawan Kumar Singh, ,Pawan Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The Principal Secretary,

  3. 3.The Chief Engineer, (Headquarter),

  4. 4.The Superintending Engineer,

  5. 5.The Executive Engineer,

  6. 6.The Executive Engineer, (LAEO),

  7. 7.The Assistant Engineer, (LAEO),

  8. 8.Dynamic Services and Company,

  9. 9.Kameshwar Singh

  10. 10.Azad Constructions,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh , Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh

  3. 04-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,Mr. Justice Shailendra SinghView PDF

  4. 04-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,Mr. Justice Shailendra SinghView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: CWJC/1840/2025 The Patna High Court dismissed Ram Pukar Singh's writ petition challenging the tender committee's rejection of his technical bid for three Panchayat Sarkar building construction contracts. The court found that Singh's key personnel (Site Supervisor Chandra Bhan Singh) provided inconsistent and unreliable information: claiming 28 years of experience at age 41 (implying work started at age 13—inherently improbable) and later declaring 33 years of experience in a subsequent tender without disclosing age. The court held these material inconsistencies violated tender conditions and constituted misrepresentation, making the disqualification legally justified and not arbitrary. Though dismissing the petition, the court ordered return of Singh's earnest money deposit and bank guarantee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 11-Nov-2025

    For Admission -I

    The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha

  6. 14-Oct-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri , Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha

  7. 16-Sep-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri , Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha

  8. 29-Jul-2025

    For Orders (On Office Notes)

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  9. 15-Jul-2025

    For Orders (On Office Notes)

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  10. 25-Jun-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  11. 06-May-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  12. 05-May-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  13. 02-May-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  14. 01-May-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  15. 30-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  16. 29-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  17. 28-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  18. 25-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  19. 24-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  20. 23-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  21. 22-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  22. 21-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  23. 19-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  24. 18-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  25. 17-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  26. 11-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  27. 10-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan

  28. 09-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  29. 08-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  30. 07-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  31. 04-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  32. 03-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  33. 02-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  34. 28-Mar-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  35. 27-Mar-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  36. 26-Mar-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  37. 25-Mar-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  38. 22-Mar-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  39. 21-Mar-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  40. 20-Mar-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  41. 19-Mar-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  42. 18-Mar-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  43. 24-Feb-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  44. 05-Feb-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  45. 04-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  46. 23-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/1840/2025

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: CWJC/1840/2025 The Patna High Court dismissed Ram Pukar Singh's writ petition challenging the tender committee's rejection of his technical bid for three Panchayat Sarkar building construction contracts. The court found that Singh's key personnel (Site Supervisor Chandra Bhan Singh) provided inconsistent and unreliable information: claiming 28 years of experience at age 41 (implying work started at age 13—inherently improbable) and later declaring 33 years of experience in a subsequent tender without disclosing age. The court held these material inconsistencies violated tender conditions and constituted misrepresentation, making the disqualification legally justified and not arbitrary. Though dismissing the petition, the court ordered return of Singh's earnest money deposit and bank guarantee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case