Ashik Hussain vs The State of Bihar — MJC/208/2023
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: BRHC010066752023
e-Filing Number
18-01-2023
Filing Number
MJC/1559/2023
Filing Date
19-Jan-2023
Registration No
MJC/208/2023
Registration Date
20-Jan-2023
Judge
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
Coram
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 14-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ashik Hussain
Adv. Kumar Veerendra Narayan
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.Sri Sunil Kumar
-
3.Sri Umesh Narayan Parbat
-
4.Sri Dhananjay Kumar
-
5.Md. Anwarullah
-
6.Wajid Ali
-
7.Wahid Ali
Adv. Amrit Abhijat,SHUBHRA Upendra Yadav
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar ShahView PDF
Summary The Patna High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed by Ashik Hussain, who challenged an encroachment order dated 01.03.2023 issued by the Circle Officer, claiming it was manufactured. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah granted the petitioner liberty to challenge the order through available legal remedies, thereby allowing the petitioner to pursue his grievance through appropriate statutory channels rather than contempt proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
For Admission - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
-
09-Mar-2026
For Admission - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
-
30-Jan-2026
For Admission - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
-
16-Jan-2026
For Admission-I Tied Up
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
-
13-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/208/2023
Summary The Patna High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed by Ashik Hussain, who challenged an encroachment order dated 01.03.2023 issued by the Circle Officer, claiming it was manufactured. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah granted the petitioner liberty to challenge the order through available legal remedies, thereby allowing the petitioner to pursue his grievance through appropriate statutory channels rather than contempt proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts