Bijendra Prasad Prabhakar @ Vijendra Pd. Prabhakar @ Vijendra Prasad Prabhakar vs The State of Bihar — MJC/5290/2018
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010065942018
Filing Number
MJC/129896/2018
Filing Date
21-Dec-2018
Registration No
MJC/5290/2018
Registration Date
21-Dec-2018
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bijendra Prasad Prabhakar @ Vijendra Pd. Prabhakar @ Vijendra Prasad Prabhakar
Adv. Dhurendra Kumar
-
2.Rajat Kishore Ranjan
-
3.Harendra Prasad Ravi
-
4.Ravi Nandan Kishore
-
5.Narendra Prasad Sah
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.Mr. Raman Kumar,
-
3.Mr. Sunil Kumar,
-
4.Mr. Sanjay Singh
-
5.Mr. Aditya Jha,
-
6.Mr. Ranjan Kumar,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: MJC/5290/2018 The petitioners filed a contempt petition against State of Bihar officials for allegedly violating a court order dated 25.08.2017 in the original civil writ case (CWJC No. 8587 of 2014). Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the contempt petition after noting that while most encroachment was removed on 19.01.2022 following magistrate and police action, a temple structure remained due to public representative protests. The court granted the petitioner liberty to pursue further grievances if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Lokadalat ( For Orders )
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
-
21-Dec-2018
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/5290/2018
Case Summary: MJC/5290/2018 The petitioners filed a contempt petition against State of Bihar officials for allegedly violating a court order dated 25.08.2017 in the original civil writ case (CWJC No. 8587 of 2014). Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the contempt petition after noting that while most encroachment was removed on 19.01.2022 following magistrate and police action, a temple structure remained due to public representative protests. The court granted the petitioner liberty to pursue further grievances if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts