Santosh Kumar, vs The State of Bihar — MJC/198/2020
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 11. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010064272020
Filing Number
MJC/1605/2020
Filing Date
20-Jan-2020
Registration No
MJC/198/2020
Registration Date
20-Jan-2020
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Santosh Kumar,
Adv. Ranjit Kumar Yadav,Chandan Kumar,Chandan Kumar, Chandan Kumar
-
2.Munni Kumari,
-
3.Khushabu Kumari,
-
4.Saroj Kumari,
-
5.Reena Kumari,
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.Sri Subham Shashank,
-
3.Sri Pramod Kumar Sahu,
-
4.Sri Subhash Kumar,
-
5.Smt. Priya Kumari,
-
6.Smt. Lakshmi Kumari,
-
7.Sri Kailash Baitha,
-
8.Sri Amol Bharti,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: MJC/198/2020 Five Panchayat Teachers (Santosh Kumar, Munni Kumari, Khushabu Kumari, and others) filed a contempt petition against State of Bihar officials for allegedly violating a court order dated 11.07.2019. The High Court of Patna found that the District Programme Officer had already disposed of the petitioners' claims through an order dated 18.10.2019, thereby addressing the underlying grievance. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the contempt petition while granting the petitioners liberty to approach the court if any grievance remained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2022
Lokadalat ( For Orders )
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
20-Jan-2020
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/198/2020
Case Summary: MJC/198/2020 Five Panchayat Teachers (Santosh Kumar, Munni Kumari, Khushabu Kumari, and others) filed a contempt petition against State of Bihar officials for allegedly violating a court order dated 11.07.2019. The High Court of Patna found that the District Programme Officer had already disposed of the petitioners' claims through an order dated 18.10.2019, thereby addressing the underlying grievance. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the contempt petition while granting the petitioners liberty to approach the court if any grievance remained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts