M/s Raj Informatics Construction vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/1825/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-Feb-2025

CNR: BRHC010038892025

e-Filing Number

15-01-2025

Filing Number

CWJC/859/2025

Filing Date

16-Jan-2025

Registration No

CWJC/1825/2025

Registration Date

31-Jan-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh , Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh , Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

WORKS CONTRACT - TENDER AND BLACK LISTING ( 15053 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s Raj Informatics Construction

    Adv. Vinod Kumar,Ashutosh Singh,Ashutosh Singh, ,Ashutosh Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

    Adv. ,Kishore Kumar Sinha 1123

  2. 2.The Principal Secretary, Department of Health,

  3. 3.The State Health Society, Shekhpura, Patna,

  4. 4.The District Magistrate Cum-Chairman, the District Health Society,

  5. 5.The District Health Society, Sheohar

  6. 6.The Additional District Magistrate,

  7. 7.District Program Manager (DPM),

  8. 8.M/s Nawyuvak Sharmik Sangh,

    Adv. Ram Kumar Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,Mr. Justice Shailendra SinghView PDF

    Case Summary: CWJC/1825/2025 The Patna High Court disposed of M/s Raj Informatics Construction's writ petition as infructuous on 08-05-2026. The petitioner had challenged the tender process for outsourcing generator services in Sheohar district, alleging missing pages (627-640) from its submitted bid and seeking consideration of its technical and financial bids. The court found that the petitioner's representation had already been disposed of by the respondent authority vide order dated 03-01-2025, rendering the petition moot. The court permitted the petitioner to challenge the authority's decision through appropriate legal channels if aggrieved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Admission II

    Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh , Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh

  4. 01-May-2026

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh , Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh

  5. 04-Nov-2025

    For Admission -I

    The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha

  6. 07-Oct-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri , Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha

  7. 22-Jul-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  8. 06-May-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  9. 05-May-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  10. 02-May-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  11. 01-May-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  12. 30-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  13. 29-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  14. 28-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  15. 25-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  16. 24-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  17. 23-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  18. 22-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  19. 21-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  20. 19-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  21. 18-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  22. 17-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  23. 11-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  24. 10-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan

  25. 09-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  26. 08-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  27. 07-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  28. 04-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  29. 03-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  30. 02-Apr-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  31. 28-Mar-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  32. 27-Mar-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  33. 26-Mar-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  34. 25-Mar-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  35. 22-Mar-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  36. 21-Mar-2025

    For Admission -I

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  37. 04-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 16-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/1825/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWJC/1825/2025 The Patna High Court disposed of M/s Raj Informatics Construction's writ petition as infructuous on 08-05-2026. The petitioner had challenged the tender process for outsourcing generator services in Sheohar district, alleging missing pages (627-640) from its submitted bid and seeking consideration of its technical and financial bids. The court found that the petitioner's representation had already been disposed of by the respondent authority vide order dated 03-01-2025, rendering the petition moot. The court permitted the petitioner to challenge the authority's decision through appropriate legal channels if aggrieved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case