Gajendra Mishra vs The State of Bihar — MJC/4489/2018

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010038622018

Filing Number

MJC/111575/2018

Filing Date

02-Nov-2018

Registration No

MJC/4489/2018

Registration Date

02-Nov-2018

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gajendra Mishra

    Adv. Daya Shanker Prasad

  2. 2.Girendra Kumar Gupta,

  3. 3.Chanda Gupta

  4. 4.Dilip KUmar Gupta

  5. 5.Rajnish Kumar

  6. 6.Dharmendra KUmar Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

    Adv. ,Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey 1123

  2. 2.The Joint Commissioner-Cum-Secretary,

  3. 3.The Director,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: MJC/4489/2018 The Patna High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed by six petitioners against Bihar's Education Department for alleged willful disobedience of a March 29, 2018 order. After the respondents submitted a show cause response with memo dated April 24, 2023 indicating the Education Department had taken a decision on the matter, the court granted the petitioners liberty to pursue further grievances if necessary and dismissed the contempt petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jan-2020

    Miscellaneous

    The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima

  4. 02-Nov-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/4489/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MJC/4489/2018 The Patna High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed by six petitioners against Bihar's Education Department for alleged willful disobedience of a March 29, 2018 order. After the respondents submitted a show cause response with memo dated April 24, 2023 indicating the Education Department had taken a decision on the matter, the court granted the petitioners liberty to pursue further grievances if necessary and dismissed the contempt petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case