Kamal Prasad Singh vs The State Of Bihar and Ors — MJC/3019/2018
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010018202018
Filing Number
MJC/78799/2018
Filing Date
07-Aug-2018
Registration No
MJC/3019/2018
Registration Date
07-Aug-2018
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kamal Prasad Singh
Adv. Ravi Ranjan
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State Of Bihar and Ors
-
2.Mr. R.K. Mahajan Principal Secretary, Department of Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
-
3.Smt. Sujata Chaturvdi, Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
-
4.Mr. Shushil Kumar, Director Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
-
5.Mr. Suraj Narayan District Education Officer, Bhojpur, Ara.
-
6.Mr. Om Prakash District Programme Officer, Bhojpur, Arra. Establishment.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
The Patna High Court disposed of Kamal Prasad Singh's contempt petition against Bihar education officials for non-compliance with a March 29, 2018 order. The court found that the respondents had granted the petitioner the second MACP notionally and refixed his salary on October 28, 2022, thereby substantially complying with the original order. The petition was disposed with liberty for the petitioner to agitate any remaining grievances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2019
For Admission - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay
-
08-May-2019
For Admission - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay
-
01-May-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Aug-2018
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/3019/2018
The Patna High Court disposed of Kamal Prasad Singh's contempt petition against Bihar education officials for non-compliance with a March 29, 2018 order. The court found that the respondents had granted the petitioner the second MACP notionally and refixed his salary on October 28, 2022, thereby substantially complying with the original order. The petition was disposed with liberty for the petitioner to agitate any remaining grievances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts