Shri Sheo Dyal Prasad WASI AKHTAR vs State Bank of India Advocate - Anjani Kumar Mishra — FA/499/1981
Disposed: Contested--D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE on 04th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010005601981
Filing Number
FA/383/1981
Filing Date
03-Dec-1981
Registration No
FA/499/1981
Registration Date
03-Dec-1981
Judge
Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya
Coram
Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 1 )
Sub-Category
FA ( 15021 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shri Sheo Dyal Prasad WASI AKHTAR
-
2.Shri Gyanchand Pd.
-
3.Shri Gopalji Prasad,
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Bank of India Advocate - Anjani Kumar Mishra
-
2.Shri Basudeo Singh,
-
3.Shri Yogi Singh,
-
4.Shri Bhagya Narain Singh,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand MalviyaView PDF
Case Summary: FA/499/1981 The Patna High Court dismissed First Appeal No. 499 of 1981 for default under Order XLI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The appellants (Sheo Dyal Prasad, Gyanchand Pd., and Gopalji Prasad) failed to appear on multiple court dates (16.03.2026, 20.04.2026, and 04.05.2026) despite repeated calls, demonstrating abandonment of their appeal against the State Bank of India and other respondents. The court found the appellants had lost interest in contesting the appeal and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
For Hearing
Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya
-
20-Apr-2026
For Hearing
Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Dec-1981
Case filed
Registration No. FA/499/1981
Case Summary: FA/499/1981 The Patna High Court dismissed First Appeal No. 499 of 1981 for default under Order XLI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The appellants (Sheo Dyal Prasad, Gyanchand Pd., and Gopalji Prasad) failed to appear on multiple court dates (16.03.2026, 20.04.2026, and 04.05.2026) despite repeated calls, demonstrating abandonment of their appeal against the State Bank of India and other respondents. The court found the appellants had lost interest in contesting the appeal and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts