PRAFULLA KUMAR SAMAL vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/37682/2025
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: ODHC010956562025
Filing Number
WP(C)/54975/2025
Filing Date
26-Dec-2025
Registration No
WP(C)/37682/2025
Registration Date
29-Dec-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
Coram
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )
Sub-Category
PENSION ( 19 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAFULLA KUMAR SAMAL
Adv. MAHESWAR MOHANTY,N.BEHERA,N.BEHERA, N.BEHERA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.DIRECTOR,SECONDARY EDUCATION, BHUBANESWAR
-
3.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, JAJPUR
-
4.CONTROLLER OF ACCOUNTS, BHUBANESWAR
-
5.DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, JAJPUR
-
6.BRANCH MANAGER, SBI, CHANDIKHOLE BRANCH
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri RamanView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Orissa allowed the Interlocutory Application filed by petitioner Prafulla Kumar Samal for correction of a typographical error in the previous order dated 30.12.2025. The court corrected the reference from "Accountant General (A & E), Odisha, Bhubaneswar" to "District Education Officer, Jajpur" in the first and second lines of the order. The rest of the order remains unchanged, and the application is disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
-
30-Dec-2025
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri RamanView PDF
-
30-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/37682/2025
Summary: The High Court of Orissa allowed the Interlocutory Application filed by petitioner Prafulla Kumar Samal for correction of a typographical error in the previous order dated 30.12.2025. The court corrected the reference from "Accountant General (A & E), Odisha, Bhubaneswar" to "District Education Officer, Jajpur" in the first and second lines of the order. The rest of the order remains unchanged, and the application is disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts