RASHMITA NAYAK ARUN KUMAR BEHERA, S.K.PATRA,S.SAHOO,G.BEHERA vs RAGHUMANI DAS —
Case under Family Courts Act, 1984 Section 19.
CNR: ODHC010927942025
e-Filing Number
17-12-2025
Filing Number
MATA /53197/2025
Filing Date
18-12-2025
Judge
DEPUTY REGISTRAR (Judicial)
Coram
DEPUTY REGISTRAR (Judicial)
Bench Type
Division Bench
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RASHMITA NAYAK ARUN KUMAR BEHERA, S.K.PATRA,S.SAHOO,G.BEHERA
Respondent(s)
RAGHUMANI DAS
Hearing History
Judge: DEPUTY REGISTRAR (Judicial)
FOR ORDERS
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | FOR ORDERS | |
| 24-03-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
Summary: In D-MATA No. 53197 of 2025 before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack, the case between appellant Rashmita Nayak and respondent Raghumani Das was adjourned. The Deputy Registrar (Judicial) ordered that the matter be put up before the Hon'ble Bench on 30.03.2026 for appropriate orders, following the appellant's counsel's submission regarding the stamp reporter's remark that "MATA does not lie." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In D-MATA No. 53197 of 2025 before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack, the case between appellant Rashmita Nayak and respondent Raghumani Das was adjourned. The Deputy Registrar (Judicial) ordered that the matter be put up before the Hon'ble Bench on 30.03.2026 for appropriate orders, following the appellant's counsel's submission regarding the stamp reporter's remark that "MATA does not lie." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts