STATE OF ODISHA SURYA NARAYAN PATNAIK, A.G.A. vs RANJAN KUMAR SETHI — WA/3411/2024

Case under Orissa High Court Rules 1948 Section 4. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010915492024

e-Filing Number

19-12-2024

Filing Number

WA/53069/2024

Filing Date

19-Dec-2024

Registration No

WA/3411/2024

Registration Date

24-Dec-2024

Judge

Mr. Justice Dixit K.S. , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Coram

Mr. Justice Dixit K.S. , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

PENSION ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Orissa High Court Rules 1948 Section 4
Letter Patents of Patna H.c. Act Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA SURYA NARAYAN PATNAIK, A.G.A.

  2. 2.COLLECTOR AND DIST.MAGISTRATE,SUNDARGARH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANJAN KUMAR SETHI

  2. 2.PRINCIPAL SECY. TO GOVT. OF ODISHA,DEPT OF FINANCE

  3. 3.ACCOUNTANT GENERAL(A AND E),ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Dixit K.s.,mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the lower court's order granting pension benefits (OCS Pension Rules 1992 and GPF Rules 1938) to the employee. The court found that the State's seven-year delay in issuing appointment orders despite a valid select list from 2000 was inexcusable and that penalizing the employee for administrative negligence would be unjust in a welfare state. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Feb-2026

    Mr. Justice Dixit K.s.,mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice Dixit K.S. , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

  5. 19-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/3411/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the lower court's order granting pension benefits (OCS Pension Rules 1992 and GPF Rules 1938) to the employee. The court found that the State's seven-year delay in issuing appointment orders despite a valid select list from 2000 was inexcusable and that penalizing the employee for administrative negligence would be unjust in a welfare state. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case