STATE OF ODISHA SURYA NARAYAN PATNAIK,A.G.A vs SARASI PARIDA — WA/3402/2024
Case under Orissa High Court Rules 1948 Section 4. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010915312024
e-Filing Number
19-12-2024
Filing Number
WA/53058/2024
Filing Date
19-Dec-2024
Registration No
WA/3402/2024
Registration Date
23-Dec-2024
Judge
Mr. Justice Dixit K.S. , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash
Coram
Mr. Justice Dixit K.S. , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )
Sub-Category
PENSION ( 19 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA SURYA NARAYAN PATNAIK,A.G.A
-
2.COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SUNDARGARH
Respondent(s)
-
1.SARASI PARIDA
-
2.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF ODISHA FINANCE DEPARTMENT , BBSR
-
3.ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E), ODISHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Dixit K.s.,mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the Single Judge's order granting employee Sarasi Parida pension benefits under OCS (Pension) Rules 1992 and GPF Rules 1938. The court held that the State's seven-year delay in issuing appointment orders despite a valid select list (ordinarily valid for one year) constitutes administrative negligence, and citizens cannot be penalized for official complacency; the lower court's order must be implemented within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Feb-2026
Mr. Justice Dixit K.s.,mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
For Orders
Mr. Justice Dixit K.S. , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash
-
19-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WA/3402/2024
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the Single Judge's order granting employee Sarasi Parida pension benefits under OCS (Pension) Rules 1992 and GPF Rules 1938. The court held that the State's seven-year delay in issuing appointment orders despite a valid select list (ordinarily valid for one year) constitutes administrative negligence, and citizens cannot be penalized for official complacency; the lower court's order must be implemented within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts