SUDAM GARADA vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/13438/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010894052025
Filing Number
BLAPL/38269/2025
Filing Date
09-Dec-2025
Registration No
BLAPL/13438/2025
Registration Date
17-Dec-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUDAM GARADA
Adv. SAROJ KUMAR PADHY,G.BANJI, R.KEDIA, S.HARICHANDAN,G.BANJI, R.KEDIA, S.HARICHANDAN, G.BANJI, R.KEDIA, S.HARICHANDAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.INFORMANT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF
Case Summary The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack granted bail to Sudam Garada in a POCSO Act case involving allegations of kidnapping, rape, and aggravated penetrative sexual assault. The court allowed bail on Rs. 25,000 bond with surety, noting the victim's statement did not allege sexual assault and considering the presumption of innocence, despite serious charges. Conditions imposed include no contact with the victim or witnesses and no intimidation of witnesses or their family members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
For Orders - Adjourned Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C./ 483 Bnss
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
-
30-Mar-2026
For Orders - Withdrawal
Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy
-
10-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF
-
22-Dec-2025
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF
-
22-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. BLAPL/13438/2025
Case Summary The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack granted bail to Sudam Garada in a POCSO Act case involving allegations of kidnapping, rape, and aggravated penetrative sexual assault. The court allowed bail on Rs. 25,000 bond with surety, noting the victim's statement did not allege sexual assault and considering the presumption of innocence, despite serious charges. Conditions imposed include no contact with the victim or witnesses and no intimidation of witnesses or their family members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts