KHIROD KUMAR MISHRA vs STATE OF ODISHA — CRLMC /469/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010884552025
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
Filing Number
CRLMC /37851/2025
Filing Date
05-12-2025
Registration No
CRLMC /469/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Judge
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
Coram
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
ANY OTHER MATTER UNDER CR.P.C. ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KHIROD KUMAR MISHRA
Adv. DIPTI RANJAN BHOKTA,N.AFREEN, S.SAHOO,N.AFREEN, S.SAHOO, N.AFREEN, S.SAHOO
SWARAJYA MISHRA
SUJATA PADHI
GUPTESWAR PADHI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF ODISHA
CHANDRAMA MISHRA@PADHY
Hearing History
Judge: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
FRESH ADMISSION - CRLMC U/S 482 Cr.P.C / 528 BNSS.
FOR ORDERS - CRLMC U/S 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 BNSS
FOR ORDERS - CRLMC U/S 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 BNSS
FRESH ADMISSION - CRLMC U/S 482 Cr.P.C / 528 BNSS.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-02-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION - CRLMC U/S 482 Cr.P.C / 528 BNSS. | |
| 22-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS - CRLMC U/S 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 BNSS | |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS - CRLMC U/S 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 BNSS | |
| 16-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION - CRLMC U/S 482 Cr.P.C / 528 BNSS. |
Orders
Summary: In CRLMC No.469 of 2026 before the High Court of Orissa, the matter was adjourned to 22.04.2026 as Opposite Party No.2 failed to appear despite service of notice. The Court directed that the interim order passed earlier shall continue, and instructed the trial court to consider any deferment requests by the petitioner while taking into account the petitioner's procrastinating conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In CRLMC No.469 of 2026 before the High Court of Orissa, the matter was adjourned to 22.04.2026 as Opposite Party No.2 failed to appear despite service of notice. The Court directed that the interim order passed earlier shall continue, and instructed the trial court to consider any deferment requests by the petitioner while taking into account the petitioner's procrastinating conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts