BUDDHA DEV ROUT SOUMYA RANJAN PATI, T.BARIK, P.P.SAHOO vs PUSPALATA JENA @ MALLIK — CMP/1836/2025

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 227. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: ODHC010821852025

Filing Number

CMP/47004/2025

Filing Date

13-Nov-2025

Registration No

CMP/1836/2025

Registration Date

18-Nov-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Coram

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )

Sub-Category

SUIT FOR DECLARATION.(TITLE/DAMAGES/RECOVERY ETC.) ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BUDDHA DEV ROUT SOUMYA RANJAN PATI, T.BARIK, P.P.SAHOO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUSPALATA JENA @ MALLIK

  2. 2.KARTIKA JENA

  3. 3.BHIMSEN JENA

  4. 4.RAMA CHANDRA JENA

  5. 5.CHAMPA JENA

  6. 6.MALLI JENA

  7. 7.SULOCHANA JENA@BAL

  8. 8.MAHESH FERROS PVT. LTD., KALINGANAGAR

  9. 9.RASHMITA NAYAK

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack allowed the petitioner Buddhadev Rout's application (I.A No.665 of 2026) for amendment of the CMP application dated 09.04.2026. The petitioner's counsel sought to substitute an incorrect document inadvertently filed with the CMP application with the correct document. The court granted this prayer for amendment and directed necessary corrections to be made, disposing of the interim application accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Feb-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Miss Justice Savitri Ratho

  4. 18-Dec-2025

    Miss Justice Savitri RathoView PDF

  5. 18-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/1836/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack allowed the petitioner Buddhadev Rout's application (I.A No.665 of 2026) for amendment of the CMP application dated 09.04.2026. The petitioner's counsel sought to substitute an incorrect document inadvertently filed with the CMP application with the correct document. The court granted this prayer for amendment and directed necessary corrections to be made, disposing of the interim application accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case