BIDESI PRADHAN vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/30993/2025
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010778352025
Filing Number
WP(C)/44501/2025
Filing Date
28-Oct-2025
Registration No
WP(C)/30993/2025
Registration Date
30-Oct-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash
Coram
Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIDESI PRADHAN
Adv. BIJAYA KUMAR BEHERA 1,B.N.RAY,B.N.RAY, B.N.RAY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.ADDL. CHIEF SECY TO GOVT. OF ODISHA, BBSR
-
3.INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, CUTTACK
-
4.MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, CUTTACK
-
5.COLLECTOR CUM CHAIRMAN DISTRICT VALUATION COMMITTE, GANJAM
-
6.A.D.M. CUM DISTRICT REGISTRAR, CHATRAPUR
-
7.DISTRICT SUB REGISTRAR, CHATRAPUR
-
8.SUB REGISTRAR, KONISI
-
9.SUB COLLECTOR CUM CHAIRMAN, SUB DISTRICT VALUATION COMMITTEE, BERHAMPUR
-
10.TAHASILDAR, KONISI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF
The High Court of Orissa dismissed four consolidated writ petitions challenging increased Bench Mark Valuations of scheduled land in Ganjam district, finding the petitions redundant as they sought relief already granted in an earlier 2023 order directing the Sub-Registrar to register sale deeds. The court directed petitioners to simply submit their registration instruments in compliance with the prior court order, and noted pending contempt proceedings address non-compliance issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash
-
31-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/30993/2025
The High Court of Orissa dismissed four consolidated writ petitions challenging increased Bench Mark Valuations of scheduled land in Ganjam district, finding the petitions redundant as they sought relief already granted in an earlier 2023 order directing the Sub-Registrar to register sale deeds. The court directed petitioners to simply submit their registration instruments in compliance with the prior court order, and noted pending contempt proceedings address non-compliance issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts