M/S ELE ANIMATIONS (P) LTD. ,BBSR GYAN S SAMANTRAY, S.ROUTRAY, B.P.SAMAL, G.DASH, B.P.SARANGI, B.C.PATTNAIK vs SATYA SWAGAT MOHANTY — CRP /47/2025
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 115. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010761682025
Filing Number
CRP /43535/2025
Filing Date
22-10-2025
Registration No
CRP /47/2025
Registration Date
23-10-2025
Judge
MR. JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Coram
MR. JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )
Sub-Category
SUIT FOR DECLARATION.(TITLE/DAMAGES/RECOVERY ETC.) ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S ELE ANIMATIONS (P) LTD. ,BBSR GYAN S SAMANTRAY, S.ROUTRAY, B.P.SAMAL, G.DASH, B.P.SARANGI, B.C.PATTNAIK
Respondent(s)
SATYA SWAGAT MOHANTY
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
CIVIL REVISION MATTERS
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-10-2025 | CIVIL REVISION MATTERS | |
| 23-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION | |
| 16-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION | |
| 09-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION | |
| 25-02-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the defendant's revision petition challenging the lower court's decision to exempt the plaintiff from mandatory pre-institution mediation under Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court held that while Section 12-A requires pre-institution mediation in commercial disputes, the exception applies when suits involve urgent interim relief, and in cases of continuing copyright infringement with allegations of ongoing harm, the requirement for mediation can be waived based on the pleadings at the time of institution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the defendant's revision petition challenging the lower court's decision to exempt the plaintiff from mandatory pre-institution mediation under Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court held that while Section 12-A requires pre-institution mediation in commercial disputes, the exception applies when suits involve urgent interim relief, and in cases of continuing copyright infringement with allegations of ongoing harm, the requirement for mediation can be waived based on the pleadings at the time of institution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts