HEMANTA KUMAR ROUT M/S L.K. MOHANTY, B.K. JENA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WPC(OAC)/3810/2014

Case under Orissa Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Section 19. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed Off on 20th April 2022.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010746162014

Filing Number

WPC(OAC)/3810/2014

Filing Date

10-Dec-2021

Registration No

WPC(OAC)/3810/2014

Registration Date

10-Dec-2021

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

WRIT APPLICATION AGAINST SAT ( 13 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

20-Apr-2022

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Orissa Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Section 19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEMANTA KUMAR ROUT M/S L.K. MOHANTY, B.K. JENA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.DIRECTOR,SECONDARY EDUCATION

  3. 3.DIST. EDUCATION OFFICER, KENDRAPARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa dismissed the Interim Application seeking modification of a Judgment dated 20.04.2022, holding that no modification application can be filed after a judgment has been implemented. The court found the modification application to be legally impermissible and accordingly rejected it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2022

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

  4. 20-Apr-2022

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

  5. 23-Feb-2022

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF

  6. 23-Feb-2022

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

  7. 10-Dec-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC(OAC)/3810/2014

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa dismissed the Interim Application seeking modification of a Judgment dated 20.04.2022, holding that no modification application can be filed after a judgment has been implemented. The court found the modification application to be legally impermissible and accordingly rejected it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case