SADASIBA BARAL vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/29438/2025

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010713582025

Filing Number

WP(C)/40847/2025

Filing Date

26-Sep-2025

Registration No

WP(C)/29438/2025

Registration Date

16-Oct-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Coram

Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 20 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SADASIBA BARAL

    Adv. GOPINATH MISHRA,A.K.MOHAPATRA, A.B.MALLICK,A.K.MOHAPATRA, A.B.MALLICK, A.K.MOHAPATRA, A.B.MALLICK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.INSPECTOR OF GENERAL REGISTRATION, BOR BUILDING, CUTTACK

  3. 3.COLLECTOR CUM DIST.MAGISTRATE, PURI

  4. 4.SUB REGISTRAR, SAKHIGOPAL

  5. 5.TAHASILDAR, SATYABADI

  6. 6.DHULIRAM BARAL

  7. 7.PRAVATI BARAL

  8. 8.RAMA BARAL

  9. 9.GOUTAM BARAL

  10. 10.AURNDHATI BARAL

  11. 11.SUBAS CHANDRA BARAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF

    SUMMARY: The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition filed by Sadasiba Baral seeking to set aside the Sub-Registrar's letter requiring full stamp duty and registration fees for deed rectification. The court found no illegality in the Sub-Registrar's reasoned order, which correctly classified the rectification involving changes to Khata, Chaka, and Plot numbers as a material change under the Stamp Act and Odisha land consolidation law, as the petitioner failed to demonstrate any illegality warranting interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

  4. 26-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/29438/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition filed by Sadasiba Baral seeking to set aside the Sub-Registrar's letter requiring full stamp duty and registration fees for deed rectification. The court found no illegality in the Sub-Registrar's reasoned order, which correctly classified the rectification involving changes to Khata, Chaka, and Plot numbers as a material change under the Stamp Act and Odisha land consolidation law, as the petitioner failed to demonstrate any illegality warranting interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case