GOURANGA KAR vs RAMESH CHANDRA KAR — RSA/611/2025
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 100. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: ODHC010693772025
Filing Number
RSA/39686/2025
Filing Date
22-Sep-2025
Registration No
RSA/611/2025
Registration Date
08-Dec-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Ananda Chandra Behera
Coram
Mr. Justice Ananda Chandra Behera
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )
Sub-Category
SUIT FOR DECLARATION.(TITLE/DAMAGES/RECOVERY ETC.) ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOURANGA KAR
Adv. MAHESWAR MOHANTY, N.BEHERA
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMESH CHANDRA KAR
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
31-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Ananda Chandra BeheraView PDF
Case Summary RSA No. 611 of 2025 - High Court of Orissa, Cuttack (31.03.2026) The High Court admitted the second appeal filed by Gouranga Kar against the dismissal of Civil Suit No. 539 of 2017. The court formulated a substantial question of law regarding whether the Trial Court and First Appellate Court had authority to ignore uncontroverted evidence and whether the trial judgment without proper issue framing under CPC Order 14 Rule 1 was sustainable. The matter has been listed for September 2026, and a status quo order has been imposed on the suit properties pending further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
For Orders
Mr. Justice Ananda Chandra Behera
-
16-Mar-2026
For Orders
Mr. Justice Ananda Chandra Behera
-
27-Nov-2025
Mr. Justice Sashikanta MishraView PDF
-
31-Oct-2025
Deputy Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
31-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. RSA/611/2025
Case Summary RSA No. 611 of 2025 - High Court of Orissa, Cuttack (31.03.2026) The High Court admitted the second appeal filed by Gouranga Kar against the dismissal of Civil Suit No. 539 of 2017. The court formulated a substantial question of law regarding whether the Trial Court and First Appellate Court had authority to ignore uncontroverted evidence and whether the trial judgment without proper issue framing under CPC Order 14 Rule 1 was sustainable. The matter has been listed for September 2026, and a status quo order has been imposed on the suit properties pending further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts