BIMAL @ BIMALKANTA PATRI vs DISTRICT REGISTRATION OFFICER, KENDRAPARA — WP(C)/28275/2025

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010688762025

Filing Number

WP(C)/39359/2025

Filing Date

19-Sep-2025

Registration No

WP(C)/28275/2025

Registration Date

29-Sep-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Coram

Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS PERTAINING TO SALE DEED. ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIMAL @ BIMALKANTA PATRI

    Adv. ASHOK KUMAR SAHOO,B.MOHAPATRA,B.MOHAPATRA, B.MOHAPATRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DISTRICT REGISTRATION OFFICER, KENDRAPARA

  2. 2.TULASIPATRI

  3. 3.JYOTIRANJAN PATRI

  4. 4.SAROJINI PATRI

  5. 5.BIDULATA PATRI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition filed by Bimal Patri seeking to prevent alienation of disputed joint family property involved in an ongoing partition suit. Following a similar earlier decision by a coordinate bench, the court directed the District Registration Officer to issue notice to the petitioner and provide a hearing opportunity before registering any sale deed related to the disputed land, rather than imposing an outright prohibition on property transfers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

  4. 19-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/28275/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition filed by Bimal Patri seeking to prevent alienation of disputed joint family property involved in an ongoing partition suit. Following a similar earlier decision by a coordinate bench, the court directed the District Registration Officer to issue notice to the petitioner and provide a hearing opportunity before registering any sale deed related to the disputed land, rather than imposing an outright prohibition on property transfers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case