AJIT KUMAR SINGH BABU vs COMMISSIONER KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHANA, NEW DELHI — WP(C)/23733/2024

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010677992024

Filing Number

WP(C)/39849/2024

Filing Date

13-Sep-2024

Registration No

WP(C)/23733/2024

Registration Date

20-Sep-2024

Judge

Mr. Justice Dixit K.S. , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Coram

Mr. Justice Dixit K.S. , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

WRIT APPLICATION AGAINST CAT ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJIT KUMAR SINGH BABU

    Adv. SASWATI MOHAPATRA,N.R.SAMAL,N.R.SAMAL, N.R.SAMAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHANA, NEW DELHI

  2. 2.DY. COMMNR. KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGHATHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Dixit K.s.,mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's rejection of his claim to convert from the Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) Scheme to the GPF-cum-Pension Scheme. The court held that the petitioner had consciously continued under the CPF Scheme throughout his service tenure (evidenced by CPF account numbers, nomination forms, and uninterrupted contributions), and his belated claim after retirement in 2016—nearly three decades after the conversion option was offered in 1988—could not be entertained due to the absence of any contemporaneous assertion of rights and unexplained delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Dixit K.s.,mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Dixit K.S. , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Dixit K.s.,mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Mr. Justice Dixit K.s.,mr. Justice Sibo Sankar MishraView PDF

  7. 10-Sep-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.k.sahoo , Mr. Justice Sibo Sankar Mishra

  8. 18-Aug-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.k.sahoo , Mr. Justice Sibo Sankar Mishra

  9. 08-Aug-2025

    Mr. Justice S.k.sahoo,mr. Justice Sibo Sankar MishraView PDF

  10. 08-Aug-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.k.sahoo , Mr. Justice Sibo Sankar Mishra

  11. 07-Aug-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.k.sahoo , Mr. Justice Sibo Sankar Mishra

  12. 06-Aug-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.k.sahoo , Mr. Justice Sibo Sankar Mishra

  13. 04-Aug-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.k.sahoo , Mr. Justice Sibo Sankar Mishra

  14. 01-Aug-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.k.sahoo , Mr. Justice Sibo Sankar Mishra

  15. 30-Jul-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.k.sahoo , Mr. Justice Sibo Sankar Mishra

  16. 25-Jul-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.k.sahoo , Mr. Justice Sibo Sankar Mishra

  17. 23-Jul-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.k.sahoo , Mr. Justice Sibo Sankar Mishra

  18. 25-Nov-2024

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice S.k.sahoo , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

  19. 04-Nov-2024

    Mr. Justice S.k.sahoo,mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF

  20. 01-Oct-2024

    Mr. Justice S.k.sahoo,mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF

  21. 01-Oct-2024

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice S.k.sahoo , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

  22. 30-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 13-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/23733/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's rejection of his claim to convert from the Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) Scheme to the GPF-cum-Pension Scheme. The court held that the petitioner had consciously continued under the CPF Scheme throughout his service tenure (evidenced by CPF account numbers, nomination forms, and uninterrupted contributions), and his belated claim after retirement in 2016—nearly three decades after the conversion option was offered in 1988—could not be entertained due to the absence of any contemporaneous assertion of rights and unexplained delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case