JAGABANDHU LENKA KSHIROD KUMAR ROUT, J.NAIK, S.K.ROUT, S.K.BHUYAN, A.JAMAL, S.K.JENA, T.S.SWARAJ, S.STHITAPRAJNA vs RANJITA ROUT@LENKA — RPFAM/249/2022
Case under Family Courts Act, 1984 Section 19. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010673022022
Filing Number
RPFAM/249/2022
Filing Date
06-Oct-2022
Registration No
RPFAM/249/2022
Registration Date
10-Oct-2022
Judge
Mr. Justice M.s.sahoo
Coram
Mr. Justice M.s.sahoo
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
FAMILY LAW MATTER ( 13 )
Sub-Category
ADOPTION & MAINTENANCE MATTERS ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAGABANDHU LENKA KSHIROD KUMAR ROUT, J.NAIK, S.K.ROUT, S.K.BHUYAN, A.JAMAL, S.K.JENA, T.S.SWARAJ, S.STHITAPRAJNA
Respondent(s)
-
1.RANJITA ROUT@LENKA
Case History
-
27-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Apr-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice M.s.sahoo
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice M.s.sahooView PDF
Case Status Summary: The case (RPFAM No.249 of 2022) in the High Court of Orissa was adjourned. The petitioner's counsel sought adjournment to obtain updated instructions, and the court granted the request. The matter is scheduled for admission hearing in the week commencing 27.04.2026. Notably, the opposite party-wife raised concerns about non-receipt of maintenance beyond Rs.3,000/- interim amount directed by the court since 28.03.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Jul-2024
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra
-
28-Mar-2024
Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatraView PDF
-
28-Mar-2024
For Orders
Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra
-
20-Feb-2024
Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatraView PDF
-
20-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. RPFAM/249/2022
Case Status Summary: The case (RPFAM No.249 of 2022) in the High Court of Orissa was adjourned. The petitioner's counsel sought adjournment to obtain updated instructions, and the court granted the request. The matter is scheduled for admission hearing in the week commencing 27.04.2026. Notably, the opposite party-wife raised concerns about non-receipt of maintenance beyond Rs.3,000/- interim amount directed by the court since 28.03.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts