DIPTI GADISHYAM vs JAVULA @ J.HYMAVATHI — WP(C)/24351/2025

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010597102025

Filing Number

WP(C)/33954/2025

Filing Date

21-Aug-2025

Registration No

WP(C)/24351/2025

Registration Date

02-Sep-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Coram

Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 20 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIPTI GADISHYAM

    Adv. CHITTA RANJAN LENKA,H.K.RATSINGH,H.K.RATSINGH, H.K.RATSINGH

  2. 2.RANJAN GADISHYAM

  3. 3.DIPAK @ DIPU GADISHYAM

  4. 4.BIRENDRA GADISHYAM

  5. 5.SUKANTI KHARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAVULA @ J.HYMAVATHI

  2. 2.YOUNNA KHUJUR

  3. 3.HEMALATA KANUNGO

  4. 4.SANKARSAN ROUT

  5. 5.SANKARLAL AGARWAL

  6. 6.SURYA KAMAL DANGUA

  7. 7.GADADHAR DANGUA

  8. 8.ARJUN KHORA@KHOLA

  9. 9.GIRIDHARI CHOUDHURY

  10. 10.REGISTRAR, CIVIL COURT, KORAPUT

  11. 11.DISTRICT SUB REGISTRAR, JEYPORE

  12. 12.I.I.C., SUNABEDA POLICE STATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition filed by Dipti Gadishyam and others seeking mandamus to enforce a prior compromise decree regarding scheduled properties. The court held that while a sale deed from 2006 was validated in earlier proceedings, the petitioners' claims for enforcement require deeper examination through proper execution proceedings rather than writ jurisdiction. The petitioners were directed to approach the appropriate court for their relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

  4. 21-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/24351/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition filed by Dipti Gadishyam and others seeking mandamus to enforce a prior compromise decree regarding scheduled properties. The court held that while a sale deed from 2006 was validated in earlier proceedings, the petitioners' claims for enforcement require deeper examination through proper execution proceedings rather than writ jurisdiction. The petitioners were directed to approach the appropriate court for their relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case